Talk:Damnak Chang'aeur district

Damnak Chang'aeur district is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

NIS and Ou Krasar Commune[edit]

The two villages appear to have the same code. Data is from NIS retrieved today. --Mr Accountable (talk) 19:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

230102 អូរក្រសារ Ou Krasar Commune

23010202 អូរក្រសារ Ou Krasar Village
23010202 ដំណាក់ចំបក់ Damnak Chambak Village

Just a small error on the NIS site. Codes from the '98 Census Gazetteer:

23010201 Ou Krasar
23010202 Damnak Chambok

Page 335 (have to take my word for it!) Cheers, Paxse (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New administrative decisions[edit]

As of this week several districts and provinces have undergone changes. I'll wait until I can get and translate a copy of the prakas before making the changes. Briefly Kep, Sihanoukville and Pailin are no longer municipalities but provinces once again. Paxse (talk) 17:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great, after changes to extant instances are complete, Template:PailinProvince could be created; and, could a similar Phnom Penh template be created? --Mr Accountable (talk) 21:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Pailin template is a great idea. But, apparently Phnom Penh is going to retains its municipality status (and gains a new khan). Cheers, Paxse (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damnak Chang'aeur District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080803013555/http://statsnis.org/areaname/vill_pro23.htm to http://statsnis.org/areaname/vill_pro23.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]