Talk:Dan Patch Corridor

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	September 20, 2009

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dan Patch Line separate page from Dan Patch Corridor[edit]

There is enough information to separate the Dan Patch Line from the Dan Patch Corridor. Any history on this page should be moved and combined with the Dan Patch Line page.

One problem with the history on this page is that it is somewhat misleading, it neglects to mention that the line origianlly ran through Bloomington and Richfield and stopped at 54th and Nicollet (then Minneapolis' city limits). Later on in 1913, construction began on a 15-mile track extension through the western suburbs of Edina and St. Louis Park.
--Myotus (talk) 02:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the MNS Ry. page?[edit]

The Dan Patch Corridor history section should be merged either into the Dan Patch Line article or the circa-2005 Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway page, which can cover the history of the Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester and Dubuque Electric Traction Company as part and parcel. In fact, perhaps all three articles should be merged, with the MnDOT study under a subheading, until there's more substance about the Dan Patch Corridor.

You're correct about the original routing, and the line (served by Progressive Rail northeast of Auto Club Junction) still exists as far as 59 1/2th and Pillsbury. North of there, Twin Cities Rapid Transit took over the original line as far as 60th and Nicollet, though I'd have to check the book Electric Railways of Minnesota by Russ Olson for specifics. A.w.stephens (talk) 05:38, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dan Patch Corridor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]