Talk:Dan and Phil (radio show)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC Radio, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BBC RadioWikipedia:WikiProject BBC RadioTemplate:WikiProject BBC RadioBBC Radio articles

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

This article is about the radio show entitled 'Dan and Phil'. It is not a general article about the duo's other ventures, be it YouTube or whatever else. Please ensure the article's content reflects this.

After 'Dan and Phil'[edit]

June 13 of 2019, Howell confirmed them to be in a relationship but did not emphasize on being boyfriends, friends with benefits, or husbands. He goes on to say he would like to keep is private life private as so does Phil. For years the two have been rumored to be romantically involved and rumors were shown to indeed to be true.

With the Dan and Phil show as a concept coming to an end shortly, I propose that a new article should be made for this new show with the different vloggers on. It will probably be ending up as something completely different to the Request Show which Dan and Phil is based on, and will definitely have a different name. We'll see though, depends how far away from the request show this new one is. -BZTMPS ★ · (talk? contribs?) 21:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2014[edit]

This edit request to Dan and Phil has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I just want to add a picture for the page. It looks quite bland without one. Iliketoeatchiken (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are able to provide the picture here, and I can add it for you? —MelbourneStar☆^talk 05:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Take your pick: link Nik thestunned 17:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moot point: there's already an image in the article. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 04:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the main picture on the Wikipedia page, Dan and Phil are mislabeled. From the perspective of the photographer, Dan is on the right and Phil is on the left. Can someone fix this? Lynn.Terry1 (talk) 20:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan and Phil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150929145246/http://www.radioacademyawards.org/winners/index.cfm?winners_award_group_id=1500&winners_award_category_id=1501 to http://www.radioacademyawards.org/winners/index.cfm?winners_award_group_id=1500&winners_award_category_id=1501

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018[edit]

This edit request to Dan and Phil has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The link to Pocket-lint in the "Reception" section links to the Wikipedia page for "pocket-lint" rather than the article on the site Pocket-lint.com which is referenced in the References section. Pocket-lint.com is a trusted tech website in the UK that has been going for over 15 years. Stuartmilesuk (talk) 21:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: @Stuartmilesuk: There is currently no wikipedia page for the website (see the disambiguation page Lint), so I have just removed the link entirely. --DannyS712 (talk) 02:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]