Talk:Daniel Bell

This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Word Choice[edit]

I'm just wondering why someone hasn't commented on this sentence: "In the past, Bell thought sociology was gay." I find this sentence offensive.

--"At the time, Bell was attacked by politically critics, left-wing and otherwise" Does the author mean that Bell was attacked politically by critics, or that he was attacked by political critics? Gasparotto 16:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Failed Prediction?[edit]

It says he failed to predict mass unemployment. Is unemployment actually higher in the post-industrial vs industrial era? I am not aware of anything showing that to be the case.

Picture[edit]

Is there a reason that a pathetic cartoonish looking picture is used instead of an photo that can be freely used or no picture at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.235.14.134 (talk) 16:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Since the publication of his book, many of the predictions have turned true. He takes credit for predicting mass consumption, but he failed to foresee the social cost, such as loss of job security or mass unemployment."

Where is the factual basis for this assertion? Unemployment in USA is lower today than 30 years ago. In Europe is similar, but in Europe post-industrial civilization developed less than in US. This is only left-wing talking point without factual basis, inserted as objective fact in the text. --Lorentino1x (talk) 11:36, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Piss poor[edit]

This article was in piss-poor shape, I took a stab at improving it. Surely some sociology student can beef up the discussion of this theories more.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 16:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it mention "professor emeritus" (but not "professor") in the lede?[edit]

I noticed that the lede sentence of this article, contains the phrase "professor emeritus at Harvard University".

One possible guess[edit]

Perhaps this article used to [when Bell was still living] say "is" (instead of "was") a "professor emeritus". Now that I think of it, this seems highly likely.

Perhaps when Bell died, many of the sentences in this article were just "converted" from present tense to past tense, without sufficiently re-evaluating whether the emphasis should be reconsidered. (See, e.g., this edit.) If so, then I recommend for the emphasis to be reconsidered.

Another (less likely?) possiblity[edit]

Did Bell spend more time as a "professor emeritus", than the amount of time he spent as an actual professor? If so, then it would be plausible for someone to deliberately decide to give [the role of] "professor" short schrift, relative to "professor emeritus". This seems unlikely, but comments "if any" are welcome.

((Note for fans of the spelling "short shrift" [without the "c"]: please [feel free to] see this note about the reason[s] for the spelling "short schrift".))

I have not read the whole article -- but I did read the [the lede, and the] "Career" section. There, I found a sentence that says [quote]:

Subsequently he taught sociology, first at Columbia (1959–1969) and then at Harvard until his retirement in 1990.

This suggests, to me, that he taught from 1959 until 1990 (say, around 31 years) (including the time at Columbia, but not including his work as Instructor at the U. of Chicago in the late 1940s).

Then, he was a "professor emeritus" (meaning, a "retired" professor) from about 1990 until he died (2011). (right?) That's less time as a "professor emeritus" (retiree) than time spent as an active faculty member. (right?)

Idea for a compromise[edit]

If for some reason it is important to include the phrase "professor emeritus" in the lede, then perhaps "both" "professor" and "professor emeritus" should be mentioned there. ...and/or, maybe Columbia could be mentioned in the lede, as well as Harvard. (Any comments?) Thanks for listening. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dissertation[edit]

Did he write one or didn't he? StN (talk) 02:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]