Talk:Daniel Curzon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possible additions[edit]

Check out his lawsuit: http://aclunc.org/news/print_newsletters/asset_upload_file524_4425.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by SatyrTN (talkcontribs) 02:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a new link; the one you provided is no longer active (pp. 17-18): https://www.aclunc.org/sites/default/files/November%3ADecember%202000%20ACLU%20News.pdf
Bricology (talk) 21:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews Section[edit]

Where I could, I have tried to improve this article and add appropriate information/references. I moved all of the reviews of Curzon's book entitled Something You Do In the Dark into a new section entitled "Reviews". I suspect that this entire section and its contents should be deleted from the article; it appears that when this article was first written that it was created as an advertisement for Something You Do In the Dark. I would welcome feedback on this issue. Stevenmg (talk) 03:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Potential point to cover[edit]

I cannot see the full Gajda source, and The Nebraskan is from while the kerfluffle was still in process.

  • Gajda, Amy (2010-02-15). The Trials of Academe: the new era of campus litigation. Harvard University Press. pp. 170–. ISBN 9780674053861. Retrieved 25 February 2014.
  • Rineer, Eric (October 29, 1999), "Students' Web evaluations of professors criticized", Daily Nebraskan, retrieved 2008-01-24

Did anything relevant come from the legal action that should be included?-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Potential sources[edit]

The snippet view does not allow enough for me to include anything in the article at this time, but if someone has access to the full view there looked like there was meat.

References

  1. ^ City Arts Monthly. City Celebration. 1981-07. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)