Talk:Daniel Flood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

The article was started based on public domain content found at http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=F000209.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Daniel J. Flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 November 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) IffyChat -- 20:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Dan FloodDaniel Flood – "Daniel" is more common in media than "Dan" per google search "Daniel Flood" Congress vs. "Dan Flood" Congress and these examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] Arbor to SJ (talk) 19:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So it is likely that "Daniel Flood" meets WP:MIDDLENAME especially because the national TV networks didn't use the middle initial, a fact not exactly captured by google search results. Arbor to SJ (talk) 23:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To editors Arbor to SJ, LaundryPizza03 and BlueJag: Courtesy notice of opened discussion. This is a contested technical request (permalink). 2pou (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Daniel J. Flood or Daniel Flood. We don't go by gross google counts or headlines or TV chyrons. We need to look at how highly reliable sources refer to him at first mention in running text. Daniel J. Flood seems to be most common in the refs used in the article, but Daniel Flood is often also used. Dan Flood is less common, especially in the most reliable sources. Station1 (talk) 01:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.