This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Anne Delong - the article is certainly better. Under Publications, you might find more recent notable reviews, such as using a citation tool, like Citer for a full citation, or to provide a link to an abstract or article using its PMID or PMC number, such as this: PMID 31767182 which, when Citer is applied, yields this.[1]Here is a list of more recent review articles by Drucker - the ones shown in the article are individual (low impact) articles, rather than higher-impact reviews per WP:MEDRS. Fyi, another notable Toronto physician-scientist, David J. Jenkins, has only an article stub. --Zefr (talk) 21:22, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Zefr, for taking the time to look at the article, and for pointing out the Citer tool, which looks useful. When I came across the article it was written basically as a tribute to Dr. Drucker, so I set out to tone it down and add independent references. The publications that are listed weren't picked by me; they were already in the article in the form of references. Since they weren't independent, I moved them to "Selected publications"; I deliberately removed the external links, since these aren't supposed to be in the body of the article.
I'm not sure I agree with your suggestion of switching these reports of individual studies for ones that summarize research in his field; if this was an article about diabetes treatments, those overviews would be perfect. However, it's a biography, so the selected publications (in my opinion) should be the ones he's known for, and according to Google Scholar these are his most highly cited papers.
If I am wrong and the list needs changing, I'll leave that to someone who has more education in the biological sciences; I am uncomfortable with choosing and adding publications that I don't understand.—Anne Delong (talk) 12:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]