Talk:Dartmouth Castle

Dartmouth Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 21, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dartmouth Castle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Medieval / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dartmouth Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 04:51, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will take this one, comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 04:51, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments This is in excellent shape; minor things to work on:

possibly link Godmerock if there is a chance an article will eventuate.
In the 16th-18th centuries section; "an instruction known as a device in 1544...". It is probably not necessary to reference the form of the instruction (device) or the year, which is already established the previous sentence.
NCOs probably should be recited in full, I suspect that not all readers will be familiar with the term.

Other than the above, the text reads well, and is properly cited. The article is neutral in tone and stable. Nicely illustrated, image tags have been checked and all seem appropriate. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 05:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers - all changes made. Thanks for the review! Hchc2009 (talk) 07:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, passing as GA. Good work. Zawed (talk) 08:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]