Talk:Data & Marketing Association/Archives/2012

Comment

Heather Fletcher 18:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Hi. I don't see anyone to talk to about the dispute, so I'm putting a note down here to ask whomever it is to reply. Please note the change I made on this page and let me know if that resolves the dispute. (The number of member associations). Thank you!

Since there was no discussion here about what was disputed, I've removed the tag. --Geniac 15:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

separate articles for DMAs

good to see a separate article for a particular Direct Marketing Association. I got more informed about the DMA USA after reading this article. Same applies to the DMA (UK) article also. i wish we could have a separate article for all the DMAs of the world. This will provide country specific DM scenario and DMA's service to the readers. Ritesh Raghuvanshi (talk) 09:27, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

See also

suggest deletion of Direct_Marketing_Association_(UK) . Reason = it is already covered under the generic article = direct marketing associations

Sanjiv swarup (talk) 10:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Ritesh Raghuvanshi (talk)I feel this should not be removed because it is good in getting informed about country specific DMA activities. Although it can be improved.

irrelevant comment by Ritesh.

Am removing the dma uk link . the dma link is enough Sanjiv swarup (talk) 00:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Neutrality dispute

It appears this article was written by someone close to the DMA. It is written in a self-serving style and uses language more typical of marketers rather than an encyclopedic tone. The article should be stubbed and rebuilt. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 21:43, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

(Followup) On closer inspection it's clear the article was indeed written mainly by the DMA (see {http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DMA_SMM here]). I'm gutting it until we can come up with something reasonable. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 21:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)