This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
David Dragunsky was interviewed in 1986 by Swedish socialist writer Arvid Rundberg. The interview discusses his background and his time with the Soviet forces during the assault on Berlin in 1944-45. The book is called Mitt Berlin and was published by Fram förlag in 1987.
WP:PROD was added as this requires translation from Russian to verify WP:BLP. This article should remain but has been largely left uncited since 2012. Nicnotesay hello!contribs 16:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Nicnote: This is NOT a BLP, he died in 1992! Nominating this article for deletion accomplishes NOTHING.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@PlanespotterA320: Ah yes, sorry, meant WP:BIO. Nominating this article gives it a bump for a Russian-speaking person to add some more reliable sources. Care to edit? Nicnotesay hello!contribs 17:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Nicnote: "Nominating this article gives it a bump for a Russian-speaking person to add some more reliable sources" So you admit it's notable, you just wanted to cause panic to force an editor like me to drop everything else we have to do for the sake of this article instead of fixing it yourself? Please do not abuse the AFD process in that manner. If you know an article is notable, like this one, DO NOT NOMINATE IT FOR DELETION. Leaving comments against deletion on AFDs that should not exist in the first place takes time away from other edits that need to be done. Please knock it off, withdraw the nominatation, apologize to all involved. You should have noted your concerns here, on the talkpage, the proper way, rather than using deletion as a bullhorn to draw attention to an article you think really needs it - there are thousands of articles in need of attention, we can't be everywhere at once, and screaming with the deletion nomination really makes me want to downgrade this one on my to-do list. Such silly deletion nominations are a patent waste of time and effort.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
