Talk:David Eady

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

citation needed tag in the Khalid bin Mahfouz case[edit]

Removed this tag - the press release (linked in the article) was pretty clear that the legislation was prompted by this particular case, so there's no need for further sources for this statement. --carelesshx talk 01:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

styled The Hon. Mr Justice Eady[edit]

"Styled" seems a strange way of putting "official title." That's just what you call a judge in England, he's not the Judge-formerly-known-as-Prince or anything. 86.160.40.222 (talk) 23:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

that's what "Styled" means. Grover cleveland (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section calls too much upon Paul Dacre[edit]

Dacre's enmity towards Eady dominates the criticism section and is overused. Can we not find some alternative critical sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.171.180.97 (talk) 10:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Eady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Eady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When did Eady retire?[edit]

His infocard says he was "in office" until 24 March 2013, but the body says "As of November 2014, he continued to sit in the High Court as an additional judge" and I am right now reading a judgment of his from 2016 (https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff73c60d03e7f57eaa239).

Is the infocard wrong, then? Or am I missing a nuanced difference between the office of "Justice of the High Court" and the position of "additional judge", whatever that is? ExplodingCabbage (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]