Talk:David Friedland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV / Undue weight[edit]

The following was left on my talk page:

I am David Friedland The bio omits my accomplishments as a lawyer and legislator and -it fails to document the "good". It focuses only on the sensational and negative parts of my life. No mention is made of some of the famous cases I tried, including the "one Man One Vote" case that changed NJ History, My defense of the West Point Cadets, nor the many laws I sponsored and helped pass, including Consumer Protection and Labor Laws and others. The bio omits my community and family life- The bio is not complete nor fairly balanced. I understand that the authors were not writing a complete bio, however this bio does not include any of the good things I worked for and accomplished ( revision of NJ Government via One Man One Vote- probably the most significant event in NJ Modern History)"

In light of this, and since the article is a WP:BLP, I have placed an {{NPOV}} tag on the article so that maybe we can get some positive content. -shirulashem (talk) 15:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not this was Mr. Friedland responding, the issues raised should be addressed. The overwhelming majority of sources available focus on his less-savory aspects makes it more challenging to create a balanced biography. I'm not sure that there are any details about his community activities and family, but I will use some of the legislative accomplishments listed in the note as a starting point to add material to the article. Any specific newspaper articles that Mr. Friedland could offer would only help in providing the additional material that this article would benefit from. Alansohn (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]