This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
It seems to me that "textual scholar" may be a bit too specific. Should it be "scholar" or "academic" ...? Hey User:Pharos, or User:Adam (Wiki Ed), is there a place where these guidelines exist on wiki? --Theredproject (talk) 22:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, the shorter and more generic the parenthetic disambiguation can be, the better. My vague impression is maybe "academic" is a bit more common on Wikipedia as a disambiguator, but "scholar" is closer to his specific field of study and may be better in this case.--Pharos (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The current title seems correct (if a bit too specific), so there's no rush. When we decide on a title you can move the article likely without any controversy (let me know if you need a hand). Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]