Talk:De Limburger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dagblad de Limburger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Limburgs Dagblad[edit]

Two stubs that would create a better article together. Most of the content at Limburgs Dagblad is about De Limburger. With reason, as the newspapers have merged and also beforehand had identical content but for the name. gidonb (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: As the creator, could you live with a merger? gidonb (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For completeness, also pinging all other non-blocked contributors for this article, including trivial contributions. User:Taketa, User:Desert188, User:I dream of horses, User:Bearcat. A merger would really help the Dutch content! gidonb (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
gidonb, I didn't really create much, but I appreciate the ping. Sure, a merger is fine. If that content, those merge histories, can be fleshed out better, with sourcing, that'd be even more helpful... Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:01, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies: Thank you for your support. With your merge support I have already undertaken a similar process at Lannoo. Without bundling, it's very hard to keep track of all these companies. gidonb (talk) 23:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 06:19, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]