Talk:Death Dealer (painting)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is that a battle axe?[edit]

Is it just me, or does the axe the dealer hold look a lot more like a headsman's axe than like any battle weapon? --Svartalf (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a "bearded axe". --Ant (talk) 15:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Death Dealer (painting). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Style::

There's no critical analysis offered of the painting that explains its popularity. The repetition of a 'conical' theme as multiple elements of the painting widen towards the bottom, reflecting eth shape of the rider's axe and head seems particularly significant. Is there a more detailed analysis anywhere? Stub Mandrel (talk) 12:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]