Talk:Deb Conroy

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Deb Conroy.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent content removal[edit]

Hi @JohnHawkinsBois, thanks for your recent contributions! Just a quick question about this edit. You removed one paragraph about Conroy's legislative career (serving as whip of the women's caucus, chairing a mental health and addiction committee, and sponsoring a bill requiring insurance coverage for mental health disorders). Further down the page, you also removed a mention of Liz Chaplin's endorsement of Conroy. Would you mind explaining both removals? I'm interested in restoring the content, but wanted to check with you first. Thanks so much! Edge3 (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edge,

Happy to explain. Given that her old committee assignments are listed and a brief explanation of how she became chair of the Mental Health and Addiction committee is on the page, I didn't think it necessary to include any more information on that committee. I am open to including her role as whip of the women's caucus, but caucus memberships are not frequently discussed on Wiki pages for state representatives. That's really up to you, though.

Regarding the endorsement--I suppose we can include it, but considering that neither LaPlante nor Chaplin have their own wikipedia pages (and for good reason, since they've only ever been local officials), I was hesitant to even include them in the campaign explainer on the page. I'd like the page to be as neutral as possible, only listing the facts (per WP:NPOV) and leaving out extraneous information.

I might further tweak the page and potentially take out her old committee assignments (aside from the one she chaired) and leave the section about her tenure as an Illinois State Rep. focused on her legislative accomplishments. I'm all about streamlining information and leaving out unnecessary detail.

Happy to discuss further if you would like. JohnHawkinsBois (talk) 22:22, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnHawkinsBois: Thanks for the explanation! I'll think about it more, especially as I continue expanding the article along with you. I think we just have different editing styles; see for example my work on Dan Cronin where I go into a lot of detail on his accomplishments but tend to focus more on secondary rather than primary sources. It's just a matter of preference, really. Once I dive into this article more, we can hash out any differences as they come along. Edge3 (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnHawkinsBois: Coincidentally, I just got this comment on my talk page suggesting that the Cronin article is too detailed. Just a day after I posted the comment above! I'm ignoring the commenter, of course. Edge3 (talk) 05:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI I've submitted a partial revert. Happy to discuss further. Edge3 (talk) 00:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Edge3:, sorry about that strange message! While I did not leave it, that is quite an odd coincidence. Just wanted to let you know that I changed a couple things in the article--grammar and also that piece of legislation you referenced regarding mental health coverage. The listed reference makes no mention of such a bill. I switched it over to include the legislation Conroy mentioned that discussed ABA therapy. I also removed mention of the mental health and addiction committee in the first blurb since it was mentioned in the second one.--JohnHawkinsBois (talk) 00:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quick edit: @Edge3:, just re-looked at that Daily Herald article and realized that the reporter does make such a claim...however, as someone vaguely familiar with the legislative initiatives of the General Assembly and Conroy's agenda, I'm not sure what bill she is referencing. I know of the bill that extended Medicaid coverage to ABA therapy (HB4769)

@JohnHawkinsBois: Thanks! I didn't suspect you at all, I just thought it was an odd comment and also a strange coincidence. Thanks for the heads-up about your other edits. Edge3 (talk) 04:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]