Talk:Deborah Howell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV Tag[edit]

Would whoever put the NPOV tag here please explain what needs to be fixed? Daniel Case 22:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the article's title, this should be a bio of her. Instead, it's concentrated on a specific issue. Knowing little about the issue, the information provided seems intended to paint her negatively instead of an unbiased respresentation. It is also completely unsourced. -- JLaTondre 22:57, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the tag to one that fit my intent better than the NPOV one. -- JLaTondre 01:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article was just created just hours ago, so obviously there needs to be some work done on it, but I don't see any NPOV violations that would warrant the tag. - Maximusveritas 02:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's better than it was, but it still reads as intended to be critical of her and not balanced. It remains unsourced as well. --~ JLaTondre
Yeah, I guess I should have looked at the history first. It definitely needs sources and some more bio material. It could also provide a little more from Howell's persective. Also, it's leaving out the conflict with Media Matters that led to the whole thing. I may come back and add some of these things if no one else does. - Maximusveritas 02:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the tag as Maximusveritas has greatly improved it. -- JLaTondre 18:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crack Controversy[edit]

A person's diary on Kos is not authoritative; the DK community has also expressed its reservations. This is potentially libelous and i suggest its removal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.20.34 (talk) 23:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deborah Howell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Deborah Howell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deborah Howell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah Howell: shameful and evil[edit]

Deborah Howell was the most evil, dishonest WaPo journalist. The world is better without her. 108.51.208.150 (talk) 03:33, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Deborah_Howell&oldid=1207654330"