Talk:December 2005 protest for democracy in Hong Kong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename[edit]

Perhaps this should be renamed to 12/4 March? Also, is this name widely used? -- Anon.

I feel that would be an unhelpful name, as it wouldn't convey a)What the marches were about b)Where they were c)What date they occurred on, to people outside the US, hence making them unlikely to be found by someone searching from memory. My 2p. 57.66.51.165 16:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC)(Skittle)[reply]
The above query was made when this article was titled 124 March. — Instantnood 16:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chief Executive[edit]

According to Chief Executive of Hong Kong article, the "elected Chief Executive must then be approved by the Central People's Government", but this statement was removed from this article. Is the statement true or false? thks. --Vsion 06:27, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's true, but it's irrelevant to the protest or electoral reform. A popularly elected Chief Executive by universal suffrage will still be appointed by the Central People's Government in Beijing. — Instantnood 08:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's quite relevant; the entire point of the protest is to call for the economic freedoms and social liberties commonly misidentified as "democracy," and such a system is inherently undemocratic. I find it quite strange that they'd go to all this trouble and not object to the main problem. Rogue 9 08:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This was a protest to the government's proposed package of electoral changes. The economy here is free enough (usually ranked as the freest), and civil liberties are basically available. Many PMs are appointed by monarchs or presidents.. is that undemocratic? — Instantnood 10:31, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that according to Basic Law, the correct word is "appointed" not "approved". Therefore except in unusual circumstances, I believe it is just a formality, then Instantnood is correct that it is irrelevant. The protestors are pushing for universal suffrage, not federalism. There are news media who used the word "approved", which is technically inaccurate and misleading. --Vsion 10:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot comment if it is simply a formality. Nobody has ever made it clear that whether the CPG can choose not to appoint a candidate-elect. — Instantnood 11:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If a person is elected, then appointed, that does mean that the person elected must be approved - even if it is a mere formality. --Xinoph 17:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Y..es.. but it's not explicitly stated in the Basic Law, and there's never such a situation, therefore it's only an assumption. — Instantnood 17:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Move[edit]

Why was this moved from the original pro-democracy title? No one's disputed that's what these guys were rallying for. Maybe you're not a fan of representative democracy Ruy but that's your own opinion. Dr. Trey 08:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to move it back. There are many protests in December 2005 alone. — Instantnood 08:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

unverified claims and rumours in the aftermath section[edit]

I have tagged the section per WP:NOR, please help adding references to them or they will soon be removed.

-- drybittermelon (talk．contribs) 19:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on December 2005 protest for democracy in Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:December_2005_protest_for_democracy_in_Hong_Kong&oldid=1201414827"