Talk:Decltype/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruslik_Zero 10:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, expand the lead. Per WP:LEAD, the lead is a summary of the article. The current lead does not contain a summary of the first section (Motivation). I think the lead should consist of two paragraphs, where the first paragraph summarizes the first section.
The article should make it clear what is the difference between 'typeof' and 'decltype'.
Refs 2, 7, 9, 14 and 16 lack publisher information.

I found no other problems. Ruslik_Zero 10:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing, I'll do my best to correct the issues. decltype (talk) 10:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the lede slightly, with emphasis on summarizing the article. I could easily have written more, but tried to balance it with the overall size of the article. The point about typeof being a common name for different non-standard type-deducing operators, while decltype is _the_ standardized version has been explicitly made in the lede. I have added publisher information to the refs. Let me know if you have further suggestions for improvement, or are dissatisfied with the changes I made. decltype (talk) 11:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the article is promoted. Ruslik_Zero 19:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, thanks for reviewing. Regards, decltype (talk) 08:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]