Talk:Dell Axim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Compare Dell Axim and Dell Axim x30. I don't know anything about these but they look pretty similar. Brianjd

Massive Beef-Up[edit]

Made the article look presentable to make it look more like a real Wikipedia Article. Any credible edits should be done at all costs, since this is rather an incomplete article. Criticisms and Concerns are encouraged, since that is an incomplete section of this article as well. I will watch and moderate this article to ensure it meets all Wikipedia Standards. Thanks.—Vesther 20:30, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropiate Tone/Unreferenced tags[edit]

I marked the Criticisms and Concerns section as inappropriate and unreferenced. The only references cited were bulletin boards, which are not suitable as sources.

Also, statements such as:

  • "Dell has no solution to this problem, besides an offer to buy a new Axim."
  • "...many users have reported a huge amount of problems..."
  • "Wifi support...is problematic at best"
  • "Microsoft [rushed] the release of Windows Mobile 5.0, telling manufacturers to complete part of the operating system by themselves"
  • "Microsoft's extremely poor implementation of a Bluetooth stack"

are inflammatory, opinionated, and uncited.

128.227.55.77 16:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Critisms[edit]

Shouldn't these be deleted, as there are no proper citations?

There are forums that detail these reportswhicky1978 talk 19:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Forums are not realiable sources, neither are blogs. See WP:V. The lone exception is when a company makes a habit of using official forums to make announcements (and then only the announcement by a verifiable company employee is usable as citation).--Crossmr 03:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that forums are not reputable sources - however "user reports that there were issues with XYZ" might be a better avenue rather than deleting these nuanced comments.pinchies (talk) 06:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pricing[edit]

Don't you think it sounds a bit too advertisement-ish to have the prices discussed on an article like this? Just curious. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 01:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-- I think pricing is useful in this article for both a practical perspective as well as a historical reference. Might not be interesting now but in 5 - 10 years, it might be mind boggling that we spent 500 bucks on such a device.

Exactly. Compare with base price of the iPad now in 2010: US-$499. Kar98 (talk) 04:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms and concerns[edit]

I've tagged this section for a complete rewrite. I'm not familiar with the whole situation on many of these issues, so I feel I cannot accurate portray these concerns and solutions myself. However the current content is unformatted, unsourced, inaccurate, and generally well below normal Wikipedia quality. I feel it's important to leave this section, but in it's current state it deserves deletion. SHARD 05:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its been removed. It was completely unsourced for too long.--Crossmr 03:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

camera connected to Axim 51[edit]

Has any one conected a camera (back up camera) to their PDA . Used the screen as a monitor? The sony camera has RCA jacks so I would need a conector Any information would be helpfull dtcat@magma.ca

u —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dtcat (talkcontribs) 00:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AxDroid[edit]

There's a project to port Google Android to the Axim x50 and x51 series. Of course the v models are the primary targets but there's also work going on for the lesser versions. http://axdroid.wikia.com/wiki/AxDroid_Wiki Bizzybody (talk) 08:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dell Axim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]