Talk:Democratic peace theory/to do

(Note that this list violates the policy stated on Wikipedia:To-do list by stating the POV of one side: Not a place to express a point of view (obviously, one would hope, but experience shows it needs to be said) and "As such, they represent a tentative consensus, helping improve the efficiency of the editing process.")

The following program should correct these defects:

• Verify that claims made are accurately and honestly represent the source.
• Verify that quotations, both from the source and from Ray's papers, are identified, and necessary (see WP:Copyvio).
• Remove peacock terms.
• Remove the "supporters say"/"Critics say" style.
• Check that the references to Ray, Rummel, and Weart are not disproportionate.
• Rewrite whatever remains into clear and comprehensible English, without jargon.
• Add recent papers of all PoV to article.
• remove substantial similarity to four times deleted article, a PoV essay.
• restore context and criticisms.