Talk:Depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the brain, nerves and nervous system.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Thank you for this information! Whew! :P Winter Light 02:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is the information relatively clear?[edit]

I wrote a Neuroanatomy paper on endocannabinoids and was having a hard time learning about DSI, so I made this page for everyone to enjoy after my paper was completed. If some parts seem confusing, perhaps a little post on this discussion page will let me know if I should tidy up a secion. I think I'd like to add a diagram someday too... (Astralyzer 19:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Having never taken any neuroscience related classes, I was still able to learn a significant amount from this article. I think it has a relative clarity that surpasses the tone of most scientific articles. Flying Hamster (talk) 09:12, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice Removal[edit]

While this article does need further improvement, ideally from an expert in neuroscience, and the encyclopedic tone might be improved, the clarity is not a major problem. In lieu of a counterargument, I am preemptively removing the clarity notice. Flying Hamster (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]