Talk:Devanagari (Unicode block)

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Consonant conjuncts[edit]

Hi there. Should there be explicit mention in the article that the way to do a consonant conjunct is first_consonant then virama then second_consonant? It is explicit in the Unicode documents but not in this article and (as of this writing) not in any article on Devanagari or Unicode. 2607:FEA8:571F:7A80:65CF:DA90:C7D3:155D (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't put that in a Unicode block article, because it applies across multiple blocks. Maybe Devanagari#Unicode if you feels it's necessary. Although it applies to the Unicode encoding of many, many Brahmic scripts. My gut feel is that it isn't needed but I wouldn't oppose its addition in the Devanagari article. DRMcCreedy (talk) 21:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]