Talk:Dialogue on Translation Between a Lord and a Clerk

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Translation studies

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I wonder who decides "notability"? Wikipedia cheerfully hosts articles about film and pop stars of whom I have never heard and in whom I am not interested, yet raises questions about matters that are of scholarly interest. Personally I was most interested in discovering information on this "Dialogue" and just wish the article was longer and had more information - though it probably contains all that can be usefully said without reproducing the "Dialogue" in full.

I note, for example, that there is a lengthy article on Kim Kardashian, a talentless but beautiful (at least, when she has her make-up on) television personality whose main achievement appears to have been a fake marriage to some other nonentity. No one wants to delete that article - and I would not wish to see it deleted, even though to my mind it is totally lacking in "notability".

By all means let the editors of Wikipedia concern themselves with accuracy, but unless they wish to claim omniscience, stop deleting articles just because they are of no interest to those editors. *Every* article is of interest to someone and a contribution to the world of knowledge, whether it is about some minor star, minor insect or minor work of literature. KendallKDown (talk) 10:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notable[edit]

I don't have time to populate the article with sources but notability is not in question see Google Books. I've removed the tag. If you believe otherwise than I request an AfD to settle the matter, and not restore the tag. -- GreenC 23:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]