Talk:Diane-Louise Jordan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Black?[edit]

Why is it relevent that she was the first black presenter? I feel that this sort of distinction is unnecessary now, and just goes to further emphasise the divide between ethnic groups which we want so badly to remove. If we are to move towards a time where the world is completely non-racist, we must stop making a distinction between people due to their race or colour of their skin, and instead look at the person and nothing else. Paulfp 14:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Er - at the time she was the first black presenter! Or would you like to retrospectively apply your ludicrously delusional utopian view of a future where all human individuality has been knocked away, so that we can all share your painfully bland view of acceptability? Whether you like it or not such things are historical facts. Or are you so terrified of causing a pre-perceived offence to black people by mentioning skin colour in historical context, that instead you desperately choose to avoid it? Perhaps in the future when discussing slavery we can remove all reference to the fact it happened to black people? And instead just say people? But then that wouldn't make much sense would it? Just like your ridiculous point! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 135.196.140.125 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

In 1990 it was still a big deal. Diane-Louise can be thought of as a trailblazer, a pioneer - someone who helped show children that black people are no different to anyone else (just as Konnie Huq has for Asians and Muslims). Race hasn't compeltely drifted from the public conscience anyway - almost every article about Lewis Hamilton outside the specialist motorsport press has mentioned that he is the first black F1 driver.--MartinUK (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Year of birth[edit]

The categorisation at the end puts her as a 1959 birth, yet elsewhere, this article gives her date of birth as February 28, 1960. Which is correct? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diane-Louise Jordan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120802224312/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/press_152_97.htm to http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/press_152_97.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]