Talk:Digital forensic process

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Digital Forensics Process written is incomplete see published article for full explanation[edit]

“The application of computer science and investigative procedures for a legal purpose involving the analysis of digital evidence after proper search authority, chain of custody, validation with mathematics, use of validated tools, repeatability, reporting, and possible expert presentation.”

Given this definition, this scientific process contains the following eight steps:

- Search authority - Chain of custody - Imaging/hashing function - Validated tools - Analysis - Repeatability (Quality Assurance) - Reporting - Possible expert presentation

Source: http://www.forensicmag.com/node/128 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.62.57 (talk) 00:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing[edit]

A recent edit was made by a person who appears to have a conflict of interest. I have reverted this change without prejudice for them being restored by an editor who does to have a real or apparent conflict of interest. I have also advertised this edit and revert and a related set of edits and reverts to WikiProject Computing. WikiProject Computer Security is a more logical choice but it's talk page was too quiet. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a lot like hockum to me; such processes would be torn apart in any decent court. I should really look back at these articles at some point. Thanks for catching this David! --Errant (chat!) 14:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking throuhgh; the paper actually is useful for the literature review. However I'd prefer to see it journalled before using it directly. And as to the ADAM process, I think that needs other sources to make note of it, especially as a new process, before we can cover it as significant. --Errant (chat!) 14:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Digital forensic process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Digital forensic process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]