Talk:Dignity (album)

Dignity (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 28, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 10, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
August 10, 2010	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Where are the pages for Gypsy Woman and Dignity[edit]

I think they also should have their own pages, and they did, but someone removed them, where did they go?? Because Gypsy Woman was really released as a promo single, and the Britney Spears promo single
I've Just Begun (Having My Fun) and Chris Cox Megamix also have their own pages, and so Gypsy Woman also deserves to have one. Dignity, has Reviews and Remixes, which is weird, 'cause it's no single, but still it has...so I think Dignity should also have his own page... User:RuuBjAh(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Do you have any proof that "Gypsy Woman" was released as a single? Regardless, it didn't chart... as for "Dignity", lots of songs on this album have reviews, does that mean they all should have their own articles? No. Remixes mean nothing. Any information about these songs can (and has been) added to this main article. –Chase (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Release history[edit]

Only one release date should be in the infobox. A "Release history" section should be created and both release dates currently listed in the infobox should be moved into a table (search "release history" in the search field on the left of your screen for examples). Note that a shortcut link already exists in the infobox to this Release history section. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 20:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good article fair-use image issues?[edit]

The only two images used on a Hilary Duff album article are of Pink and Gwen Stefani. I don't understand how this is fair-use. The captions can be said just as clearly in the prose and there is absolutely no need for these two images. Plus, the rationales for both images don't specify that they will be used on a Hilary Duff album article. Just because they have FURs doesn't mean they can be used on any article. All of this should have been given some thought. Am I wrong in my thinking? I am ready to either remove both images entirely, or ask for a reassessment on the article's GA status, no matter how recently it was promoted. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I can't contact the GA reviewer; he or she has been banned as a sock puppet. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The images are both free, so do not have nor do they need fair use rationales. Geometry guy 23:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for clarifying. I don't think I understood what a free image really was or how it could be used. As I stated in a response on the reassessment, I still find the lack of Duff images a little strange, but that's probably just me. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per your concerns, I removed the non-Duff images and replaced them with two images of her. –Chase (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead single[edit]

is Play with Fire really the lead single, when it has no release dates (anf formats) i think were confusing it from "Lead Single" to a promo (in which they chart too!) If(i)Were 06:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifiwere (talk • contribs)

"Dreamer" samples Depeche Mode song??[edit]

I don't know about this......there's nothing in the albums booklet that says this from what I can tell. Is it mildly similar? Maybe. But does it outright sample Depeche Mode's "Just Can't Get Enough"?? I feel that this is REALLY a stretch. Is there a source for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:199:300:D92:D55A:DBF7:AC2A:9F1B (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dignity (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100201221709/http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/hilary-duff/hilary-duff.htm to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/hilary-duff/hilary-duff.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?reviewid=11693
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/hilaryduff/albums/album/13967536/review/14010971/dignity
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oltremoda.rai.it/category/0,1067207,1067031-1071825,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dignity (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]