Talk:Direct-attached storage

Merge

Um, clearly it should be merged. I just don't know how. Any takers? True Vox 13:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, agreed. MERGE, SESAME. darn.. Anyone else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.114.53.254 (talk) 03:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Umm, what should be merged with it? The only merge proposal I can see in this article is from this edit, which proposed merging direct attached storage into here - which obviously should have been done, and was done in this edit - but that proposal came after all of the above comments. Probably it was the merge proposal in direct attached storage, which was added in this edit from 2005. Guy Harris (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Fiber Channel

Fiber channel is not commonly used in a DAS environments, this is mostly used in SAN deployments. Atticka (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

So... It cannot be commonly used in DAS, because it is commonly used in SAN? How insightful. --Kubanczyk (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the helpful encouraging comment. DAS and SAN are two very different methods of organizing and connecting storage. A FC attached storage device can still be used in a 1-to-1 connection environment (IE: DAS), however this would be a waste considering FC is designed to connect many devices to a single storage unit (IE: a SAN). The explanation, albeit very simple, is here to help those of us who need help understanding the technology. Atticka (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC).

But FC actually is used in DAS architectures in this world, whether it is a waste or not by your judgement. Many small companies first buy a FC disk array for DAS, and later extend the architecture to SAN by buying FC switches. It is economically viable to them. I would even say this is pretty much a standard. On a side note, many Sun servers have internal FC drives. --Kubanczyk (talk) 15:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Image

The image is contradictory and clearly shows a shared storage solution (single storage device with two servers attached). Direct Attached Storage should include all one to one attached storage devices ranging from USB drives, CD-ROMS to SCSI attached storage arrays. Atticka (talk) 14:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Image

Nice image, unfortunately I have absolutely no idea what it's supposed to signify. Letter, greenback, Gig-Ethernet? And what's a "small exchange deployment"? Maikel 23:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Grandmother compatibility

Could someone please write a layman's introduction about DAS? This article leaves me clueless. Thanks. Maikel 23:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Here is a good example of what I have in mind. Maikel 23:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Is the lead (the first paragraph) insufficient? Please add {{huh}} tag at the point where you stop understanding. Yeah, the picture could be better. --Kubanczyk (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

USB

Why are USB drives (and firewire) not included as examples of DAS? clearly they are directly attached, and they are storage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.151.242.2 (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Examples are just examples, and not a full list. Yes, most of the storage is of DAS kind, including USB and firewire devices. Although I don't know why you inquiry specifically about those. Using the name DAS just implies that you are comparing something to SAN or NAS, it is not used outside such context (for example "here, take my USB DAS" sounds weird). --Kubanczyk (talk) 08:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Direct-attached storage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090515204633/http://www.serialata.org:80/technology/esata.asp to http://www.serialata.org/technology/esata.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)