Talk:Discovery Tree

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 1 February 2023 by reviewer Atlantic306 (talk · contribs).

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Forestry

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Addition of tone tag to page[edit]

I really like the way that this article is written, but feel that it has too strong of an authorial voice to an encyclopedic tone.

For example, the sentence "But this natural wonder would soon become a symbol of humanity's destructive impact." is not sourced and is, to me at least, an expression of the authors opinion.

Let me know if you agree with my assessment or think the tone-tag should be removed :) TheExpandingBureaucracy (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Yesterday, I created an edit making the tone more neutral.

If you would like to change the edit, it's all up to you.

Also, you can check if the tag is valid to be removed.

Thank you! Hanawikis (talk) 18:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I agree with you that the page had a strong authorial voice, so I just reworded and summarized sentences. Hanawikis (talk) 18:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanawikis Thanks for all the work on the page. Sorry I haven't been active for a couple weeks, life has been a little hectic. I think the page is in a pretty good spot now tone wise, your rewording and summaries are great. :) TheExpandingBureaucracy (talk) 11:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, there were many others working on the tone, too, so it was a team effort! Hanawikis (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]