Talk:Dissolve (2019 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 27 May 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: move to Dissolve (2019 film). Also, it is not clear if there is consensus for retargeting Dissolve (film) to Dissolve, so its target will not be changed; a determination of the target for Dissolve (film) can be made via WP:RFD if need be. For now, I have put a hatnote on Dissolve (filmmaking) regarding why Dissolve (film) redirects there. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


3000 (film)Dissolve (film) – the official title is Dissolve. "3000" was a temporary title at a limited screening. 2804:14C:B8:8325:88A8:703A:2195:9619 (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Relisting. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not so fastDissolve (film) is a redirect to Dissolve (filmmaking), a style of ending a scene or transitioning between scenes in film. This seems like a perfectly valid redirect. I realize that the specific South Korean film is no longer titled 3000. But based on the existing valid redirect, it can't just be moved to "Dissolve (film)" either. I don't have an answer here, but I definitely lean oppose on the current proposal. We need a better solution here – so I want to wait to see what others have to say... --IJBall (contribstalk) 01:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@IJBall: move it to Dissolve (film) and add a note at the top for people interested in Dissolve (filmmaking). -- 2804:14C:B8:8325:98E9:98EE:AB0A:4BFC (talk) 14:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A hatnote is one possible solution, but I want to see if that's the consensus of others... In my case, I'm not convinced that's the best solution. We'll see... --IJBall (contribstalk) 14:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.