Talk:Diver certification

Merge with C-card

{ec)The subject matter of C-card is a subset of this topic. Both articles are stubs and have been for some time (2007/2009). Is there much chance of the combination growing to an awkward size?

• I suggest merge and redirect for C-card, possibly rename the article to Diver certification.• • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 06:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
• I support the concept of the merger. Cowdy001 (talk) 06:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

That was quick! • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 06:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Done. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 08:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Wrong Data contained in the Diver certification equivalences

The "Advanced" bubble in the "Diver certification equivalences" lists SSI Advanced Open Water Diver as the Advanced level (the one after open-water), where the proper certification is Advance Adventurer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yjawhar (talk • contribs) 10:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

B-Class review

B

The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. Looks OK. Y The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. Unsure, looks a bit lightweight, but can't think offhand of how it should be expanded. Will get back to this. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. Looks OK. Y The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. Looks OK. Y The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. Reasonably representative. Y The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Looks OK. Y

Pending decision on completeness of coverage. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 16:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diver certification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426051306/http://sioscuba.ucsd.edu/dive_about.cfm to http://sioscuba.ucsd.edu/dive_about.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)