Talk:Don't Go in the Woods (1981 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Released In UK[edit]

This is now released in the UK. Does anyone know how uncut it is? - NBRBH 15:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

I've added the cleanup tag. I actually enjoyed reading this, but it seems very POV. Can the widely regarded claim be backed up by a review or website link ?

Megapixie 04:26, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

POV![edit]

I added an NPOV to it because this article simply reeks of bias. "absolute bottom of the barrel?" GMAFB. If you feel it's not as bad as I think it is, tinker with it and dump the NPOV, but this article needs some serious clean-up. --DodgerOfZion 07:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did see this DVD for sale at a Video chain, and it was at the bottom of the 'Discount DVD' barrel. But it was more of a bin as I recall. --Seele 3:55, June 9th 2006

Zing, my friend. Zing. Still, this article reeks of POV.--DodgerOfZion 05:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed this reeks of POV. Anthony Florister 23:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How does one describe examples of "Le Bad Cinema" without POV? Considering that their very badness is held as a virtue by aficianados.... Just wondering. --RLR 10:11, 27 August 2006

My Edit 3/10/07[edit]

Brandon DiCamillo does not provide commentary on the DVD, this is a misconception.

CKYGuy 21:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don't Go in the Woods (1981 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141210080516/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/dontgoinwoodsalone.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/dontgoinwoodsalone.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]