Talk:Donna Woolfolk Cross

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

CC of posting at 65.54.155.44[edit]

Donna Woolfolk Cross[edit]

Thank you for adding several paragraphs of information. However, as Wikipedia rules and guidelines require, these claims must be confirmable and verifiable through authoritative print/online sources. Please add citations, or these claims must be deleted. I'm sure you understand that, as Wikipedia says on each edit page, "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Otherwise, anyone could start a page and claim they are Phi Beta Kappa. Thanks-- Tenebrae 19:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we just remove the copyvio paragraphs? The IP that added them has done nothing since that edit. Cheers. --EarthPerson 16:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adapted and done. --Tenebrae 04:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice addition! :) Thanks. --EarthPerson 22:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Donna Woolfolk Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070416151145/http://www.readinggroupguides.com:80/roundtable/interview-cross_donna_woolfolk.asp to http://www.readinggroupguides.com/roundtable/interview-cross_donna_woolfolk.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]