Talk:Doping in association football

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The subject of this article and the fact, that football is "the world game" makes it a large task to write an informative article about it. I found very little about the subject on wikipedia and originally tried to add some to the Doping (sport) article but this article is to long already and also a bit disorganised, I find. I think, the importance of football to a large percentage of the population warrants a critical view in a separate article. Please help by expanding it.EA210269 (talk) 07:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree!! There should be a link to a section of this article on the page of every national football association. There should also be a table summarising the standpoint of each organisation, the number of offenses discovered and whether the organisation complies with the WADA code. Cheers for helping with this extremely important topic, telewatho (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Testing Programmes in England[edit]

"In the 1999-2000 season, testers were present at just 32 of the 3,500-plus league games..."

That can't be right. Twenty teams x thirty eight match schedule = 3,500 matches?[1] 2602:306:8099:F2D0:8D0E:A756:E71F:C1F4 (talk) 19:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Math

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Doping in association football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]