Talk:Dovecot at Blackford Farm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDovecot at Blackford Farm has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starDovecot at Blackford Farm is part of the National Trust properties in Somerset series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2015Good article nomineeListed
December 6, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dovecot at Blackford Farm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 10:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Grabbing this for a review shortly. Miyagawa (talk) 10:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, time for the review:

  • Lead: Does it still contain over 300 nest boxes, did it once contain over 300 nest boxes? I'm only asking because the Dovecot I visited last year at Eastcote has had some significant damage to the inside and no longer contains the shelving that the nest boxes would have sat on.
  • History: WP:INTEGRITY suggests that it's best to group citations at the following punctuation mark or at the end of the sentence. So I would suggest that cites 6 and 7 are moved to the end of that sentence to stop it from looking cluttered.
  • Moved - I tend to do this if the source supports a particular fact rather than everything in the sentence.— Rod talk 20:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • History: Is there a cite for "The building is used as a store by the neighbouring farmer."?
  • The McCann book says this so I've reused an existing ref.— Rod talk 20:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's all the issues I can find. Once you've rectified those, I think this can be marked up as a Good Article. Miyagawa (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your comments.— Rod talk 20:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Great. Happy to promote, nice job. Miyagawa (talk) 22:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]