Talk:Drakkar Noir

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

Comment[edit]

The article does not mention the cultural reference to Drakkar Noir in the film 10 Things I Hate About You. The Glee reference also contains poor grammar ("Principal Figgins ... says he use it too"). I am adding/editing these details to improve the quality of this page. Supervegan (talk) 18:31, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drakkar noir.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Drakkar noir.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 24 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Drakkar noir.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why Remove the Cultural References Section?[edit]

The use of the word "dumb" to justify the removal of such an obviously important section is simply not enough. 66.229.50.252 (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

None of these "cultural references" have any sourcing. It is useless trivia, and being unsourced really doesn't belong in the article.Two kinds of pork (talk) 03:44, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semiotics textbook[edit]

I'm removing the section about the fragrance's link to Dracula from the semiotics textbook. A look at the cited passage reveals absolutely ridiculous reasoning, with the authors finally concluding that wearing Drakkar Noir is tantamount to selling one's soul to Satan in order to achieve sexual conquests. It's ridiculous reasoning that reaches to the point of absurdity to try and make a cogent argument.68.116.145.47 (talk) 20:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drakkar Noir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002055448/http://www.fragrance.org/fifi-awards-winners.php?year=1985 to http://www.fragrance.org/fifi-awards-winners.php?year=1985

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drakkar Noir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120606051806/http://www.lorealusa.com/_en/_us/html/our-company/L-Oreal-USA-at-a-glance.aspx to http://www.lorealusa.com/_en/_us/html/our-company/L-Oreal-USA-at-a-glance.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]