Talk:Dralasite

A fact from Dralasite appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Dralasites are an amoeboid extraterrestrial race depicted in science fiction role-playing games for the past 25 years?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/January.

Wikipedia

Science Fiction

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles

Role-playing games

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles

Plural form?[edit]

Is the plural form "Dralasite" or "Dralasites"? The article uses both in different places; if both are acceptable, it should say that. GRuban 17:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In every game I played, the plural was "Dralasites." That is, the games with Dralasites in them.--Mike Selinker 18:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The article seems to have direct quotes using "Dralasite" for the plural ... GRuban 19:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

I believe that this article does belong in the d20 future category, as this is one of the playable races in the setting. It was removed from the category earlier today. Can anyone point out a good reason for it to not be included in that category? 144.226.230.36 20:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, add that category. - House of Scandal (talk) 20:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drawing added[edit]

I wrote this article some time ago. The image I added has since been deleted and having no illustration here bothered me. So I just drew a picture of a Dralasite and added it. - House of Scandal (talk) 20:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool pic! --SpockMonkey (talk) 15:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I am trying to improve the Dralasite article so it isn't in danger of deletion. Having been introduced in 1982 and having been featured multiple RPG's since then, I know they are notable but aren't sure I can prove this to the public at large. Help from experienced and policy-savvy editors would be welcome. - House of Scandal (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing prod[edit]

I don't know if this article should be kept in the long run, but it's not such a straightforward delete that a prod will do it. Maybe give House of Scandal some more time to improve it and then if it still doesn't satisfy do AfD instead. Cretog8 (talk) 19:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelljammer[edit]

Did these guys really appear in any official D&D products? I haven't seen any evidence to that fact, yet. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they appeared in a Spelljammer Monstrous Compendium. Boston (talk) 13:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure about that, I certainly don't recall seeing them. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 02:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NO. It appears from the original MC's that this is a work of Fandom, backed up by the fact that a google search for the term with spelljammer really only returns Wikipedia and the referenced website (fan made) I will remove the references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.3.177.99 (talk) 14:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]