Talk:Dravya

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dravya article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Dravya appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in Jain cosmology, the universe is made up of six substances, called dravyas—souls, matter, the principle of motion, the principle of rest, space and time?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/January.

Wikipedia

Philosophy: Eastern High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Eastern philosophy

Jainism Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Manual of Style – Naming conventionsJainismWikipedia:WikiProject JainismTemplate:WikiProject JainismJainism articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 16 May 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. I am moving the current broad-concept article to Dravya (philosophy) for anyone who may want to selectively merge content into this article. SST flyer 09:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dravya (Jainism) → Dravya – There is no other Dravya in destination, then no need for disambiguation. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. — Amakuru (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - target Dravya is a more general article. Are all these uses related only to Jainism? Dravya in Vaiśeṣika Sūtra isn't Jain is it? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment @Capankajsmilyo: there is already an article at the target you're proposing for this move, which is probably on a more general topic than this one. What are you suggesting we do with that other article? — Amakuru (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The other "more general" article contains sourced information about Jainism only. Nothing else is sourced there. So it can be easily merged, removing unsourced info. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 03:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support and merge per nom. If RS support the use of the term outside Jainism, the article can broaden to include that, and limit the Jainism material to a section, Buddhism (or whatever) material to another exception, etc. There's not rationale under WP:SUMMARY, WP:SPLIT, WP:SPINOFF, and WP:CONTENTFORK for there to be a rich article on Dravya in Jainism, and a miserably stub purporting to be a broader article, that actually sources nothing but rehash of the Jainism-specific material. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 16:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.