Talk:Driver's Privacy Protection Act

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Kind of silly to delete a page when we are creating it, don't you think? Simsong (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When contesting the proposed speedy deletion of an article, the Speedy Deletion Tag should not be removed - the hangon tag should be placed below it. Also, when creating an article, it's often much easier to use the Show preview rather than saving it, as this prevents a Speedy Deletion tag being placed on it before the article is finished. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 05:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect templates[edit]

The "Legislative history" section includes the advertising template. It was applied *after* removing the obvious commercial content. There doesn't seem to be anything left in this section other than straight reporting, so I'm removing the template.

The subsequent "Jurisprudence" section, however, is polemical. It makes multiple assertions without external references. Eg: "Websites, 3rd party advertising, and tracking firms began using mechanisms that violated a user's privacy."

As much as I sympathize with the position taken, this needs references. Accordingly I'm adding the citation template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.218.231.23 (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucille[edit]

Hey 2603:6011:1544:B136:C53C:286F:8396:95E6 (talk) 13:49, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]