Talk:Duisburg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I know nothing of Duisburg beyond what's in this article, but the sentence:

Duisburg is one of the most unattractive cities in Germany and ranks among the most hideous in the whole world.

needs to be balanced perhaps with input from the Duisburg equivalent of the Chanber of Commerce.


Duisburg is absolutely NOT one of the most hideous cities in the world! OK, it might not Berlin or London, but face it, it's an industrial place with the biggest Binnenhafen in the world. You can't possibly expect Eiffel towers and Big Bens! There's for example the Salvatorkirche, the Altstadt, the Landschaftspark and quite a few other places to see both in and out of the city. And for anyone interested in european industrial history, Duisburg (and the Ruhrgebiet in general) is the place to be.

Anyway, what does "hideous" refer to? I can blindfold you and take you to a very hideous place and when I take the cloth off I will tell you: this is London. And when you are back home, you will say: London is really hideous. Spazzo 06:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

illogical sentences[edit]

At the end of the first paragraph it states that because of its proximity to Düsseldorf airport and the biggest inland harbour Duisborg has become a major place for steel production and commerce. That implies the following:

- before the establishment of the inland harbour as the largest in thw world and its identification by German national and some international media as Duisburgs main success story....

=> Duisburg wasn't a center for steel production (clearly wrong, steel produciton in Germany as a whole and Duisburg as well has become gradually less important... If at all Duisburgs decline was less severe than elsewhere. However Mannesmann, Thyssen and Krupp are gone or merged and that is a decline. The first sentence indicates to people who know nothing about German industrial history that there is a causal relation between the establishment of the harbour and that airport and the steel production center which really is a result of Gründerzeit and economic miracle clustering of industry in the region and not some airport or harbour.

=> Duisburg wasn't a center of commerce.... see above it has declined in its iportance as center of commerce for Germany... In fact it has gone from being Germanys richest cities to one of its poorest in the matter of 40 years.

=> The International Airport in Duisburg has anyhting to do with it. Far fetched really. The Steele producers would not have moved away wihtout the airport. It has a positive effect on Duisburgs economy for sure but although Duisburg is a city dominated by its economy like few else the airport should not be meintionsed in the opening paragraphs.

Have a long and fullfilling life....

SiSch —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.2.162.67 (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ruhrort merger[edit]

The Ruhrort article consists of little more than an outdated encylopædia article from the early 20th century. Maybe rewrite this a little, then put the pieces that remain into a seperate Ruhrort section on this page. --Doco 00:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The article of Ruhrort is a shambles. It is not only outdated. There is also wrong information, eg. on the population at the time of the incorporation of Ruhrort into Duisburg. Whoever wrote that article he did not know anything he was writing about. Spazzo 06:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duisburg Dockers[edit]

The "Duisburg Dockers" are an American Football - Team, they do not play Baseball! In fact, Baseball - Teams are hard to find in Germany, American Football is quite popular.

Please introduce the Infobox German Location. It provides a coherent look among German cities. Lear 21 23:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dispargum equals Doesburgum equals Duisburg ?[edit]

Hello, I'm trying to track down where my ancestor Clodio lived. His page (which is so referenced) says "Dispargum". List_of_Latin_place_names_in_Continental_Europe#Cities_and_towns_in_Germany says that's Duisburg. Should Duisburg's page also say so? Should Dispargum be a redirect here? References (from the list): [1] Dispargum—>Doesburgum .. Thanks! 「ѕʀʟ·」 22:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

de:Duisburg#Name_der_Stadt seems to confirm this.. 「ѕʀʟ·」 22:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Port[edit]

Hutchison Port Holdings said his [[ Duisburger Container Terminal]] is the largest in-land port of the world, is the Duisburger Container Terminal is one of the company or Duisport is not the owners of the port?. Matthew_hk tc 06:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

The pronunciation of the city name is printed thus: [ˈdyːsbʊɐ̯k], but the .ogg file with the pronunication sounds to me more like [ˈdyːzbʊɐ̯ç] (with /z/ and /ç/ instead of /s/ and /k/). So which is correct? If both pronunciations are correct, shouldn't both be listed? --Oz1cz (talk) 17:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The german page says that the pronunciation is like this: [ˈdyːsbʊɐ̯k]. It also says that the local people may pronunce it like [ˈdyːsbʊə̯ç]. To me (as a german who doesn't live in Duisurg or near of it) the pronunciation currently linked at this page is not correct. I guess that's how the local people pronunce it, but that is not the popular german pronunciation. The right pronunciation is linked at the german page (spoken by a woman). Since I don't know how to change it, I would suggest someone else will do this, please. --Martina2504 (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Mayor[edit]

I'm sorry, but Duisburgs Lord Mayor is Sören Link (SPD), not Benno Lensdorf (CDU)! He was elected on July 1st 2012 (run-off). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ophelia Fennel (talkcontribs) 19:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 13:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Duisburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add

{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duisburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Duisburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Duisburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Duisburg-Walsum which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sankt Johann Church[edit]

There is a problem with this article as I have the impression that a German who is not a native speaker (like me) of English has redacted it, I assume this because of some strange constructs and spelling. But I would like to focus on the church and the abbey. They are, in principle, two separate identities. The church[1] and abbey (Abtei Hamborn in German)[2] are located next to each other. The picture shown is strictly speaking a part of the abbey and not the church. 78.94.176.74 (talk) 14:46, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References