Talk:Duluth and Northeastern Railroad

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Cloquet Terminal Railroad with Duluth and Northeastern Railroad[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, given independent notability of the historic railroad. Klbrain (talk) 11:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both are very short articles, one is the successor to the other. They can be covered in one article which would make both easier to understand. MB 01:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better to keep them separate. The topics are distinct save for the fact that they operate(d) the same stretch of railroad. Mackensen (talk) 09:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand the rationale behind proposing a merge, but in this instance I concur with Mackensen. They're distinct companies, and it's best to have separate articles for them. Consider Central Vermont Railway and New England Central Railroad. The latter is the direct successor to the former, but there's enough distinct things to discuss for each that both merit their own articles. I'm often a mergist, but railroad companies are an exception to that. I only support merging when one company is a subsidiary of another and never operated trains (for instance, I merged Hartford and Springfield Railroad into Hartford and New Haven Railroad because the former was a subsidiary created for legal purposes and never operated trains). I will drop Cloquet Terminal Railroad on my list of articles to expand, I have a personal goal of one day getting a railroad GA in every state. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mackensen and Trainsandotherthings:, merging would avoid notability issues. The article has one source, and while I can finds lots of passing mentions of this railroad, I haven't found anything in-depth. If you can add some better sources, please do. Otherwise, it will probably be AFD or Draftify. MB 21:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A railroad that operated for decades is almost certainly notable, and it doesn't become more or less notable if it's merged somewhere else. Let me look around. Mackensen (talk) 21:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2] [3] it took me all of 5 minutes to find these and this is far from all that's out there. I'm practically a deletionist as far as my AfD habits are concerned and even I think this easily clears GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.