Talk:Dunvegan-Central Peace-Notley

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Alberta / Electoral districts Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dunvegan-Central Peace-Notley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927115425/http://www.altaebc.ab.ca/EBCFINALReport.pdf to http://www.altaebc.ab.ca/EBCFINALReport.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

High energy and carbon costs[edit]

We receive 635.26 x 2 for our social security monthly. Our power and gas billing for December amounted to $1,255.87. Delivery charges for electric was more than usage charges. We have changed our billing to a lesser fixed rate which will hopefully help a little. I have a provincial pension albeit it is minuscule plus our CPP monthly so we are fortunate that we can get by - but, any extras would put us in the hole. Any extra medical expenses are being taken from our retirement fund. What do seniors have to look forward to in the future? The inflation rate is rapidly rising. We were ones that saved for our retirement but it seems like this will be gobbled up through extra costs in energy, inflation and otherwise. I’m so sad that our country has been changed so much that seniors who helped to build up the country in the past are being “swept under the rug”. Judy Clements-Berwyn 2001:56A:FD72:8B00:A8B3:C110:88C3:8B9 (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]