Talk:Duployan shorthand

Unintelligible sentence

Under the Chinook Writing heading is this sentence: "The Chinook writing is not able by the absence of affixes and word signs, the phonological rigor - vowels were not omitted, even when predictable - and its use of W-vowels." I can make no sense of this. I suspect that a clause is missing after "able" but I can't correct it since I really don't know what the intended meaning is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnudelman (talk • contribs) 00:47, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Not an error, just an errant space. "not able" should be "notable". The editor inserted some random spaces, and I thought I had caught them all. --User:Vanisaac —Preceding undated comment added 03:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC).

High priority?

I like Duployan as much as the next script maven, but did you get consensus from the WikiProject on Writing Systems on this, or were you just asserting it? Ogham for instance has only Mid-importance. (And is very important to me.) -- Evertype·✆ 09:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

It seemed to be equivalent to several scripts (Nsibidi, Rongorongo, Cretan Heiroglyphs, &c.) that were classified as "high". I was tying to be thorough - I initially classified it "mid" - but I found that the mids seemed to be national alphabets, transliterations, individual symbols, and scripts found on only a few archaeological finds, without modern descendents. In other words, I would have classified Ogham as High as well. I'd like to get this settled, so I'll start up a conversation on the talk page and see if anyone bites. Vanisaac (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

have examples of use on native graveyard markers

recently thanks to a local history FB group, I came across some pics of an old St'at'imc graveyard on Seton Lake where the headstones are clearly in Duployan/Kamloops Wawa.....haven't had time to decipher them, if someone here is an adept with the shorthand, please use "email this user" and I'll send them to you for deciphering.Skookum1 (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duployan shorthand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509180941/http://chinookjargon.home.att.net/ljcr24.htm to http://chinookjargon.home.att.net/ljcr24.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)