Talk:Dutch hypothesis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dutch hypothesis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fletcher and spelling[edit]

1. Why has Prof. Fletcher's name been taken off as the person who named the hypothesis as "Dutch hypothesis". 2. Isn't aeitology the more proper spelling? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the name, I took the reference to Professor Fletcher out because there was no internal explanation in the text as to who he is. Regardipng 'aetiology' (British spelling) versus 'etiology' (American), for reasons of reader friendliness in scientific writing I prefer the simpler, American form. But no matter (and WP:ENGVAR). —MistyMorn (talk) 10:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That Fletcher named the hypothesis "Dutch hypothesis" is a verifiable fact.[1] What do you wish? Regarding simplicity isn't it a matter of perception? Can we have aeitology back? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 10:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done. —MistyMorn (talk) 10:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:41, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]