Talk:E-HRM

I think this article is a complete mess now and would suggest it is changed back to the original article I wrote (plus the improvements to formatting etc made by some other editors) as a starting point from which it may be improved, rather than the dead end it has now reached.

--LeuvenInfo (talk) 23:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is the first article I have contributed to Wikipedia so please help me improve it by making suggestions. The first thing that I have done wrong is the page title - it should be E-HRM, not E-hrm - unfortunately I do not know how to change it! Thanks.

LeuvenInfo (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also realise that the reference links do not work right now - I will see if I can find out how to fix them, but if anyone else could do it before I figure it out that would be great.

LeuvenInfo (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article Quality[edit]

I think this article is a complete mess now and would suggest it is changed back to the original article I wrote (plus the improvements to formatting etc made by some other editors) as a starting point from which it may be improved, rather than the dead end it has now reached.

--LeuvenInfo (talk) 23:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Moved the above edit to bottom of page as per guidelines. Having reviewed the edits from the article I found that one editor last August had added whole sections lifted intact from an article here date 2007. This I have removed as per WP:Copyvio. Not sure what else you were referring too. Its not a good idea to revert an article back to the start particularly one you created better to make some specific edits / post your suggestions here Tmol42 (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the part edited 03:20, 29 September 2023‎ WTwinMk-IIThe2ndVer2 is fully AI generated and is absolutely no-sense bcs of missing sources and the part that is not proofed by market. As HR professional I can say there is no any type of type definition for HRM services, bcs there is pretty new problem in the market and there is no leader in this field. 89.174.0.115 (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]