Talk:EY Tower

EY Tower was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 28, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Mid-importance).

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Is there any reason why this can't be covered in the Toronto Dominion Centre article? The other towers in the complex don't have their own articles. - SimonP (talk) 03:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I am also concerned that the major element of this article is a tenant list, and I don't see a lot of potential in this article to grow beyond that. I am not sure that Wikipedia = tenant directories, as per WP:NOT and WP:TENANTS (the latter being more informative than it is directly applicable). --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been two years +, and no one has taken issue with Simon's point. I have redirected this page to the main TD Centre article, which has a detailed description of each of the towers. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 April 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 15:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ernst & Young Tower → Ernst & Young Tower (Toronto) – Forgive me if this is not a "controversial" move, but I think it is worth some input. Currently, Ernst & Young Tower, talks about the building in Toronto, Ontario. However, there is a building in Cleveland, Ohio, with the same name. That is titled Ernst & Young Tower (Cleveland). I have read WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and I don't believe that the Canadian building has any more primary usage than the building in Cleveland. So here is what I am proposing -- I propose to move the Canadian building's Wikipedia entry to Ernst & Young Tower (Toronto) and than have Ernst & Young Tower be a Disambiguation page to point to the building in Toronto or Cleveland. For now, I just added a hatnote to the Canadian building article, letting readers know about the building in Cleveland. CookieMonster755 ^(talk) 03:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support in this sort of case WP:TITLE should relate to the real world not the selection of the real world made by ourselves. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per page views, no clear primary topic. SSTflyer 10:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ernst & Young (disambiguation) should be created and the current title redirected there, to cover both towers, the company, and Ernst & Young Plaza, Ernst & Young HC, etc -- 70.51.45.100 (talk) 06:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

70.51.45.100 -- I agree with you. Cheers. CookieMonster755 ^(talk) 21:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created Ernst & Young Tower (disambiguation). I think that Ernst & Young is unambiguous, and Ernst & Young (disambiguation) would just hold partial-title-matches all related to the primary (only) topic for the name. Thus, it would be more appropriate to include related named things such as the towers, the plaza and the hockey club as links in the "see also" section of Ernst & Young, if they weren't linked to earlier in that article. wbm1058 (talk) 15:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.