Talk:Eagle (British comics)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cannibaloki 17:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   There's a citation needed tag in the 1982–1994 section.

   I've hidden that text for now. I'm fairly sure its accurate but I'm hoping to find a source in the next few weeks. Parrot of Doom 19:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

   Okay, I will accept your explanation in good faith.--Cannibaloki 19:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   On hold for a week.--Cannibaloki 19:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

   Passed.--Cannibaloki 19:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

 Doing...--Cannibaloki 17:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for the speedy review. Parrot of Doom 22:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)