Talk:Earlswood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

There's more than one Earlswood - there's ones in Chepstow, Plymouth, and Solihull as well as Redhill. Does there need to be a seperate entry for each one?

86.128.216.139 02:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:UKCITIES: a section can be used instead. A page can be created for the above if these were once villages, manors or similar, but it should normally be a redirect you can use the # symbol to achieve the correct redirect. Owing to Earlswood the ward (with tiny bit, Whitebushes), featured in the ONS website (office for national statistics) being only this Surrey one, and a railway station it seems to stand apart for notability for creating an actual article. What an article cannot be though is WP:PEACOCK, WP:WEASEL, WP:ADVERTISING and similar, so I have found enough sources mentioning it that are entirely scholarly to avoid this.- Adam37 Talk 18:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reference for swimming but not related claims[edit]

http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/Lake-tourist-magnet/story-19506060-detail/story.html#axzz2nUHU0SbQ

©Geni (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earlswood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earlswood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Earlswood&oldid=1196063256"