Talk:EastEnders in Paris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review[edit]

@AnemoneProjectors: Hi I have added more info to the article courteous of JuneGloom07, what makes you think it could be the wrong image of The Kiss is there more than one statue? Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's the right image, so don't worry. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 23:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AnemoneProjectors and Soaper1234:Would you say this article is good enough to move to the main space or would you have any other suggestions for it? Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 15:22, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelvin 101: Wow! This is a very impressive article! The main issue for me would be the pre-production section does not sound very encyclopaedic and sounds more like a news article. I would also possibly look at expanding the lead. Aside from this, everything looks really good! Soaper1234 - talk 15:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah the lead was a little short, I have now expanded it and will see what can be done about the pre-production section. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 16:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have a read of the article shortly. Someone came along and expanded the plot, which is too long for episodes that were so short. Every detail looks to be included, so I'll see what I can do. @Kelvin 101: are there sources for the list of landmarks? — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 19:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've done some cleaning up so I'm happy now, but it's a shame I can't read the full HighBeam articles to see if anything was missing. If there are sources for the on-location, I'd be more than happy to see it moved to mainspace. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 20:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@AnemoneProjectors: For the landmarks sadly not I was just going of what I saw on screen, I know this is original research and will problerley have to go although there are a few links below that mentions some locations but the Walford Webs may not be considered reliable.

I will forward you the email with the highbeam articles.

Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 20:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?[edit]

@Kelvin 101: Wow the article looks really good and I'm glad it has been moved into mainspace. I was wondering whether you are considering nominating it for WP:DYK? I think it would be a great achievement and I thought I would ask since you cannot nominate after Friday 16 February. Soaper1234 - talk 16:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You could nominate the article on Kelvin 101's behalf. ;) - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@JuneGloom07: I can? Well, if Kelvin 101 doesn't mind/is unavailable to do it themselves? Soaper1234 - talk 20:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure you can. I think someone did it for me once. Just fill out the form as usual, putting Kelvin 101 as the author, and you'll be listed as the nominator. It will say something like "Moved to mainspace by Kelvin 101 (talk). Nominated by Soaper1234 (talk)." - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Soaper1234 and JuneGloom07: Sorry for late reply, I had forgot about did you know. Yeah please feel free to nominate it. The more coverage it can get the better Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuneGloom07: Brilliant! Thank you June, you're a star @Kelvin 101: Thank you. I'll get onto it now. Soaper1234 - talk 21:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh very good, didn't realise this had already been moved over :-) — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 11:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]