Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Forestry C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cause of Native Depopulation[edit]

The article contains a quote stating that "For reasons that are unclear, approximately 500 years ago, aboriginal populations declined significantly throughout Eastern North America and more broadly throughout the Americas." It's my understanding that there is at this point more or less a consensus that the depopulation of North America in this time period (after 1492 but before Europeans actually reached most of the interior areas of the continent) is primarily due to epidemics of contagious disease introduced by contact with Europeans, such as smallpox. For instance, Population history of Indigenous peoples of the Americas says outright that "Repeated outbreaks of Old World infectious diseases such as influenza, measles and smallpox (to which they had no natural immunity) were the main cause of depopulation." I'd argue that information should be included here, if the article is going to discuss the causes of the depopulation of Native Americans during this time period at all.

Untitled[edit]

I study prehistoric ecosystems in Eastern North America, and I am not aware of any solid evidence supporting the notions expressed in this article. The references given are not appropriate, and are not from peer-reviewed literature. Most available literature on this subject suggests that climate and climate change (not Native Americans) played the most important role in determining prehistoric forest ecology.

I believe this article should be amended to better reflect current scientific views (i.e. the notions expressed in this article are controversial and currently not well supported by data) and include proper references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.122.14.20 (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to follow up seven years later: I agree. The evidence that the grasslands in the Southeast are 1. lightning caused 2. naturally at least as widespread as forests, if not more so, and 3. much older than the last glacial maximum; has accumulated in the 15 years since the source reference was written. I've provided a more modern reference, and re-worded some of the climatic claims.Masebrock (talk) 05:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eastern savannas of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061007170731/http://www.forestry.state.al.us/publication/TF_publications/tffall99/products_of_the_longleaf_pine.pdf to http://www.forestry.state.al.us/publication/TF_publications/tffall99/products_of_the_longleaf_pine.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

I think that there should be a section on endangered species in the woodlands. The red-cockaded woodpecker, for example, is a keystone species that many are actively trying to protect in the remaining longleaf woodlands. Also, I did not see any mention of attempts to restore longleaf pine habitat. Sggeer (talk) 23:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]